ATCDumbo Page: 1 of 1

ATCDumbo
March 28, 2025, 21:47:00 GMT
permalink Post: 11856277

ADSB Out on Blackhawk

Dumbo Question 1.

How would the successful transmission of ADSB Out information by the Blackhawk have changed the outcome on January 29?

After watching the US Congress “grill” the military, FAA and NTSB how could they participate in a conspiracy of silence…

The NTSB will be seen as either very dumb or deceitful or both.

Now what was the number of the Q ANON Pizza shop, I feel like some truth tonight.

Send it to me via Signal. What a joke! The relatives of the crash victims were there to watch the farce.

The small elephant in the room…

Last edited by ATCDumbo; 29th March 2025 at 03:46 .

Subjects ADSB (All) ADSB Out Blackhawk (H-60) FAA NTSB

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

1 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ATCDumbo
March 29, 2025, 05:05:00 GMT
permalink Post: 11856426

Dumbo Question 2

Given the extraordinary level of interest in the US Army Blackhawk carriage, activation and transmission of ADSB Out information in the US Congress in the last couple of days, do you think the NTSB could have confirmed (facts) how that information would have been displayed in the cockpit of the CRJ and the ATC TWR cab at Washington DC Reagan?

The small elephant in the room.

Last edited by ATCDumbo; 29th March 2025 at 08:00 .

Subjects ADSB (All) ADSB Out ATC Blackhawk (H-60) CRJ NTSB

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

1 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ATCDumbo
March 29, 2025, 05:28:00 GMT
permalink Post: 11856433

VHOED191006 , and others interested.

Dumbo Question 3

As you are no doubt aware TWR Visual Separation is a very powerful tool / method in the eyes of the controller or in the eyes of a delegated pilot. (Literally and metaphorically speaking, i.e pun intended.)

It is the very basis of ATC Aerodrome Control. Sophisticated use requires experience and excellent situational awareness.

I just wonder how many (if any) of the “reported” near collisions in the NTSB Preliminary report going back 4 and 14 years respectfully included perfectly safe visual separation?

The small elephant in the room.

Last edited by ATCDumbo; 29th March 2025 at 07:58 .

Subjects ATC NTSB Preliminary Report Separation (ALL) Situational Awareness Visual Separation

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

1 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ATCDumbo
March 30, 2025, 23:59:00 GMT
permalink Post: 11857616

Refer to ATCDumbo Question 1!!

ATCWatcher Thank you…It’s like pulling teeth but we will get there eventually ….

No thanks to the NTSB for the selective choice of facts…What should I expect in a country of fake news and alternative facts?

As for your comments re if the CRJ had ADSB_IN; exactly ….welcome to my nightmare!

Shock horror The Holy Grail turned out to be the holy hand grenade!!!

Re all lawyers reading… Put that one in your pipes and smoke it!

Always look on the ….. Now what pizza to order tonight

Subjects CRJ NTSB

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

1 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ATCDumbo
April 01, 2025, 22:38:00 GMT
permalink Post: 11858937

ATCDumbo Question 4: In three parts

BugBear : In your post above you appear to imply that the LC had to work 2 different radar screens. (Memories of Uberlingen?)

Are you sure about that?

And to manage two discrete VHF frequencies. What, two different ?headsets? Is that what you are implying?

And where do you think the ADS-B information from the CRJ was displayed in the TWR Cab, on one or more of the radar screens?

Subjects ADSB (All) CRJ Radar

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

No recorded likes for this post (could be before pprune supported 'likes').

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ATCDumbo March 28, 2025, 21:47:00 GMT permalink Post: 11856277	ADSB Out on Blackhawk Dumbo Question 1. How would the successful transmission of ADSB Out information by the Blackhawk have changed the outcome on January 29? After watching the US Congress “grill” the military, FAA and NTSB how could they participate in a conspiracy of silence… The NTSB will be seen as either very dumb or deceitful or both. Now what was the number of the Q ANON Pizza shop, I feel like some truth tonight. Send it to me via Signal. What a joke! The relatives of the crash victims were there to watch the farce. The small elephant in the room… Last edited by ATCDumbo; 29th March 2025 at 03:46 . Subjects ADSB (All) ADSB Out Blackhawk (H-60) FAA NTSB Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context. 1 recorded likes for this post. Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.
ATCDumbo March 29, 2025, 05:05:00 GMT permalink Post: 11856426	Dumbo Question 2 Given the extraordinary level of interest in the US Army Blackhawk carriage, activation and transmission of ADSB Out information in the US Congress in the last couple of days, do you think the NTSB could have confirmed (facts) how that information would have been displayed in the cockpit of the CRJ and the ATC TWR cab at Washington DC Reagan? The small elephant in the room. Last edited by ATCDumbo; 29th March 2025 at 08:00 . Subjects ADSB (All) ADSB Out ATC Blackhawk (H-60) CRJ NTSB Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context. 1 recorded likes for this post. Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.
ATCDumbo March 29, 2025, 05:28:00 GMT permalink Post: 11856433	VHOED191006 , and others interested. Dumbo Question 3 As you are no doubt aware TWR Visual Separation is a very powerful tool / method in the eyes of the controller or in the eyes of a delegated pilot. (Literally and metaphorically speaking, i.e pun intended.) It is the very basis of ATC Aerodrome Control. Sophisticated use requires experience and excellent situational awareness. I just wonder how many (if any) of the “reported” near collisions in the NTSB Preliminary report going back 4 and 14 years respectfully included perfectly safe visual separation? The small elephant in the room. Last edited by ATCDumbo; 29th March 2025 at 07:58 . Subjects ATC NTSB Preliminary Report Separation (ALL) Situational Awareness Visual Separation Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context. 1 recorded likes for this post. Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.
ATCDumbo March 30, 2025, 23:59:00 GMT permalink Post: 11857616	Refer to ATCDumbo Question 1!! ATCWatcher Thank you…It’s like pulling teeth but we will get there eventually …. No thanks to the NTSB for the selective choice of facts…What should I expect in a country of fake news and alternative facts? As for your comments re if the CRJ had ADSB_IN; exactly ….welcome to my nightmare! Shock horror The Holy Grail turned out to be the holy hand grenade!!! Re all lawyers reading… Put that one in your pipes and smoke it! Always look on the ….. Now what pizza to order tonight Subjects CRJ NTSB Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context. 1 recorded likes for this post. Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.
ATCDumbo April 01, 2025, 22:38:00 GMT permalink Post: 11858937	ATCDumbo Question 4: In three parts BugBear : In your post above you appear to imply that the LC had to work 2 different radar screens. (Memories of Uberlingen?) Are you sure about that? And to manage two discrete VHF frequencies. What, two different ?headsets? Is that what you are implying? And where do you think the ADS-B information from the CRJ was displayed in the TWR Cab, on one or more of the radar screens? Subjects ADSB (All) CRJ Radar Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context. No recorded likes for this post (could be before pprune supported 'likes'). Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

Posts by user "ATCDumbo" [Posts: 5 Total up-votes: 4 Page: 1 of 1]¶