Page Links: Index Page
| dragon6172
January 30, 2025, 02:47:00 GMT permalink Post: 11816784 |
Video from afar. Doesn't look good Subjects: None No recorded likes for this post (could be before pprune supported 'likes').Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads. |
| dragon6172
January 30, 2025, 14:10:00 GMT permalink Post: 11817272 |
The helicopter\x92s right turn was directly over a golf course, not a residential neighborhood. It was probably done for noise abatement reasons, because it then turned left and proceeded down more directly over the river.
The golf course is on a peninsula in the river, so the helicopter was flying over water before and after it made the two turns.
Subjects
ATC
DCA
Radar
Route 4
Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads. |
| dragon6172
January 30, 2025, 16:21:00 GMT permalink Post: 11817368 |
I have a little over 1000 hours flying with ANVIS-9s, they do just fine with high cultural lighting situations (this was 20+ years ago).
Subjects
Night Vision Goggles (NVG)
Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads. |
| dragon6172
January 31, 2025, 02:05:00 GMT permalink Post: 11817847 |
Could the sudden right turn be last minute (second) avoiding action when the RW pilots realised they were about to collide with an airliner?
The helicopter was tracking in southerly direction with the airliner passing left to right in front of them. A right turn is the obvious avoiding action as a last ditch manoeuvre to avoid a collision.
The sudden right turn by the helo in the final moments is surprising, but I wonder, given the bland "Can you see the CRJ", followed by "Pass behind the CRJ", whether they were actually looking, in the dark through their night vision goggles, at the aircraft lined up on 01 which was just starting its takeoff run. "Can you see it". There it is, down there. "Pass behind it". OK, let's turn now to pass behind it.
Subjects
CRJ
Pass Behind
Pass Behind (All)
Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads. |
| dragon6172
July 31, 2025, 22:18:00 GMT permalink Post: 11931562 |
They were flying over the river, not the built up areas. Not sure how much time you have flying in a Blackhawk, but if you are over the water at night at 200' your radalt is giving you better indications of how far you are above water than your bar alt. If the two disagree, which one do you think you'll be using?
(Same is true in the Seahawk). As to your point on the cause of the accident, yes, they were not aware of the traffic coming into 33 (for reasons beaten to death already). I'm going to offer a contributing cause that I think merits consideration: there was mention made early on of there being 1, not 2, tower controllers on duty at the time when apparently 2 is the normal number. Had there been two, the helicopter might have been handled differently, but we'll never know.
Spoiler
In regards to your other comment about them not seeing the CRJ, I have believed from the time that the radio traffic was public that the controller was not specific enough when he asked PAT 25 "do you have the CRJ in sight?" Something along the lines of "PAT 25, CRJ on final for RWY 33 is at your 10 o'clock less than a mile, pass behind that traffic" should have drawn the helo crews eyes to the left to hopefully see the traffic. Even better would have been to have the helo do a left 360 over Hains Point. Subjects
ATC
Blackhawk (H-60)
CRJ
Pass Behind
Pass Behind (All)
Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads. |
Page Links: Index Page