Posts about: "Jump Seat" [Posts: 36 Pages: 2]

ALTSELGREEN
June 13, 2025, 21:36:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11900934
Originally Posted by 51bravo
Question to Human Factors experts or pilots having experienced/witnessed that.

Disclaimer: I never flew something with retractable undercarriage, just flaps. I also acknowledge that under substantial stress, and especially panic, your lizard brain awakes and takes over your Einstein brain. But on the other hand less so in routine handlings before things go south.

So - my question: If you look at the 787 cockpit layout (google, YT, your picture), how can Flaps Up instead of Gears Up be executed? It is a totally different activation of arm muscles, hand muscles, fingers even when not looking what you do ("three greens no red" anyone?). I mean, I totally understand the mishandlig of the switches and buttons on the Vilnius B737 - taking out hydraulics instead of anti ice. Switches are close, switches are similar. But gears and flaps levers - I just dont understand why still many people here set this on the high probability list. I absolutely don't buy it. At least it would be on my possible causes on a list far, far down. Considering the deck layout on a 787.

Do I miss some physiological/psychological human brain factors?
Because some of the professionals seem to have written here - "quite possible" in real stressfull world. Maybe on some GA aircraft where flaps select is also sometimes on the front panel. But 787?

NB: I am still on the symmetrical and significant thrust loss hypothesis ~10s into the airborne time.
I was in the jump seat on a 747 as 3rd pilot many years ago. The Captain was PF and after the positive climb call the Captain called \x93Gear Up\x94 and the PNF selected and stated \x93 Flap 10\x94. The PNF immediately reversed the selection before anything actually moved \x85. It is totally possible.
However in this case, I don\x92t believe this was what happened. Let\x92s await the investigation.
Capi_Cafre'
June 14, 2025, 21:36:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11901861
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
A TCMA bug just doesn't bear thinking about, I really hope that doesn't turn out to be the case.
Occam just tapped me on the shoulder and mentioned that there's been more discussion on the possibility of a quintuple-redundant failure than there has been on the possible ramifications of a relief pilot in the jumpseat for departure. Not that this thread needs any more idle speculation of course.
BrogulT
June 20, 2025, 03:33:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11906558
Originally Posted by twochai
Does anybody know if the jump seat was occupied?
Wikipedia (I didn't check their cited source) shows 242 total on board--230 passengers, 10 FAs and 2 pilots. If correct, that at least means there wasn't a relief pilot.
draglift
June 20, 2025, 15:41:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11907068
Sailvi767 wrote
Shutting down the wrong engine below 400 AGL is extremely rare. So rare in fact that I believe it has not happened in a jet transport class aircraft.
It happened to a BAC 111 taking off from Linate Milan in 1969 when the wrong engine was shut down after a surge on takeoff. The plane never got above 250 feet and landed in a snow covered field gear up. The wrong engine identification was initiated by a Captain on the jumpseat!

https://aerossurance.com/safety-mana...human-factors/
sabenaboy
June 21, 2025, 14:46:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11907810
I was wondering what the cockpit jumpseat policy in Air India is? Is it known if someone was flying along in the cockpit?
Capn Bloggs
June 21, 2025, 15:06:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11907827
Originally Posted by sabenaboy
I was wondering what the cockpit jumpseat policy in Air India is? Is it known if someone was flying along in the cockpit?
Originally Posted by T28B
Were there another person, one expects that evidence will be found as the CVR data is deciphered by the investigating team.
And it should be on the loadsheet.
Propellerhead
July 09, 2025, 12:36:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11918364
No, not easily. Need to be done separately. Unless done from the jump seat with 2 hands.
MLHeliwrench
July 09, 2025, 19:22:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11918591
Originally Posted by tdracer
It is conceivable that a pilot - reaching down to the center console to adjust something unrelated - could have muscle memory cause him to turn the fuel off to both engines.
The trouble I have with that theory is the there is nothing routinely toggled while flying in that throttle quadrant area on a 787 or 777. It is fuel or stab cut off/out. Especially so at such a critical phase of flight. Has it been confirmed if there was a jump seater or not on this flight?
tdracer
July 09, 2025, 19:52:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11918606
Originally Posted by MLHeliwrench
The trouble I have with that theory is the there is nothing routinely toggled while flying in that throttle quadrant area on a 787 or 777. It is fuel or stab cut off/out. Especially so at such a critical phase of flight. Has it been confirmed if there was a jump seater or not on this flight?
I'm thinking radio - agreed there is no reason why you'd make such an adjustment right after rotation, but there is nothing normal or usual about both engines quitting right after rotation.
DIBO
July 09, 2025, 21:49:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11918656
Originally Posted by MLHeliwrench
Has it been confirmed if there was a jump seater or not on this flight?
Question was asked before a couple of times, but except a few answers like " should be on the loadsheet ", " evidence should be on the CVR ", nothing conclusive was reported.

I can add that a few weeks ago, I saw a video from the local media (don't remember the source and/or link), paying tribute to the 12 crew-members with a short bio/a few pictures of each individual, and it were 2 cockpit crew and 12 cabin crew (with a few very junior/trainee CC's). But that in itself, does not prove anything regarding possible jumpseaters.



KSINGH
July 12, 2025, 18:33:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11920737
Originally Posted by Bristolhighflyer
One suggestion about why the report was sanitised and a fuller transcript was not provided could be to delay public reaction on this and avoid copycat events.
Jump seaters should be mandatory on all flights. On AS2059 the jumpseater maniac was overpowered by the other pilots. Two against one is better than pilot against pilot.
The 10 second delay could be explained by a cabin altercation when one pilot saw the other one deliberately perform the cutoff.
are you saying a third pilot or a cabin crew with minimal (see none) technical knowledge, less rigorous training and more often than not a fairly small female?

and frankly having spoken to some of these cabin crew who are quite open about their mental \x91struggles\x92 I can\x92t say I\x92d feel more secure with them sat out of my eye line but within reach of certain critical controls\x85.

wasn\x92t the 2 person rule initiated after Germanwings and then quite quickly abandoned because many airlines saw the risks of cabin crew in the flight deck more routinely with a single pilot as more of a risk factor than the alternative?
Bristolhighflyer
July 12, 2025, 20:53:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11920826
Originally Posted by KSINGH
are you saying a third pilot or a cabin crew with minimal (see none) technical knowledge, less rigorous training and more often than not a fairly small female?

and frankly having spoken to some of these cabin crew who are quite open about their mental \x91struggles\x92 I can\x92t say I\x92d feel more secure with them sat out of my eye line but within reach of certain critical controls\x85.

wasn\x92t the 2 person rule initiated after Germanwings and then quite quickly abandoned because many airlines saw the risks of cabin crew in the flight deck more routinely with a single pilot as more of a risk factor than the alternative?
not cabin crew. Suggestion was for 3 fully trained pilots to monitor one another.
galaxy flyer
July 13, 2025, 00:48:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11920968
Originally Posted by ignorantAndroid
No, it was abandoned because the airlines found it inconvenient and EASA caved to their demands. At least one large airline simply ignored the rule while it was in effect.

U.S. airlines have had to follow that rule for decades. How many accidents have been caused by rogue cabin crew?
Alaska had a close call when a jump seater on some illicit drug tried to shut down engines using the fire handles. FDX had the jump seater attack the crew.
ignorantAndroid
July 13, 2025, 01:25:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11920977
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Alaska had a close call when a jump seater on some illicit drug tried to shut down engines using the fire handles. FDX had the jump seater attack the crew.
The Alaska case was a pilot, FDX was a flight engineer.
Bunk-Rest
July 13, 2025, 08:11:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921113
I was thinking last night, that the only time I have ever seen both fuel control cutoffs operated together, has been in the simulator.
If a crew is getting in the sim to do an exercise or practice. To save time, whilst the pilots are getting in the seats, the instructor is getting the sim ready, ie getting the door shut, the machine upon it\x92s jacks etc. often to save a lot of startup time, he will lean over the console, move both switches to the \x93running\x94 position, tben press the master reset at the back, snd hey presto the aircraft is at the start of the runway, all engines running, ready to go!
Simples. - saves 10 minutes of sim time.

Whoa\x85
Suppose there was a third person on the flight deck ?
Unauthorised possibly, knowing air india\x85.
And he did it.
He is out of the pilots field of view, he can reach them easily with both hands, and absolutely explains the verbal exchange that took place.
When does the voice recorder start running?
Engine start if I remember vaguely. So the presence of a third person may be totally undetected in the recordings.
CharlieMike
July 13, 2025, 08:19:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921120
Originally Posted by Bunk-Rest
Whoa\x85
Suppose there was a third person on the flight deck ?
Unauthorised possibly, knowing air india\x85.
And he did it.
He is out of the pilots field of view, he can reach them easily with both hands, and absolutely explains the verbal exchange that took place.
When does the voice recorder start running?
Engine start if I remember vaguely. So the presence of a third person may be totally undetected in the recordings.
Hadn\x92t even thought of that, but the fact there was no motion of the gear at all when positive rate was achieved makes me believe there is more evidence to suggest action-slip.
CharlieMike
July 13, 2025, 08:43:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921144
Originally Posted by Bunk-Rest
Why did you do cutoff ? Question may have been directed at the third person in the cockpit who had actually done it.
I guess with current information it\x92s going to be hard to rule this out. Once they fully analyse the CVR, I think we\x92ll know the answer to this. If the FO is asking the question, it\x92ll be more likely that this isn\x92t the case.

The switches were operated at 3s after liftoff\x85exactly the time positive rate would be confirmed\x85so I\x92m still thinking third party isn\x92t the most likely scenario.

ACW342
July 13, 2025, 11:17:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921239
Third seat occupant

Back in the days before it became illegal I used to blag my way into the cockpit on short haul flights using my RAF ID card. Part of the cockpit checks, if the third seat was occupied, was the question "Pax, seat belt on and secure?" to which I always responded "Seat Belt on and secure". I am sure that that Question and Response is still used on check lists and if that is the case that Q&R would have been recorded on the CVR. That should, hopefully, do away with the 'third person in the cockpit" theory


ACW342

Last edited by ACW342; 13th July 2025 at 11:56 .
galaxy flyer
July 13, 2025, 13:00:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921306
Originally Posted by ignorantAndroid
The Alaska case was a pilot, FDX was a flight engineer.

FDX jump seater was a disgruntled employee, not any kind of crew.
BrogulT
July 13, 2025, 14:05:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921344
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
FDX jump seater was a disgruntled employee, not any kind of crew.
He was a former Navy pilot employed as a FedEx flight engineer. Obviously he wasn't part of the assigned crew on that flight, but he was a qualified crewmember not just some random FedEx forklift driver.