Page Links: First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last Index Page
Matt2725
2025-06-12T10:04:00 permalink Post: 11898987 |
That very much sounds like the RAT is deployed as the aircraft goes by the camera. 1 user liked this post. |
Porto Pete
2025-06-12T10:24:00 permalink Post: 11899028 |
https://x.com/krok7517100/status/1933089931347345596
That very much sounds like the RAT is deployed as the aircraft goes by the camera. ![]() Hard to say and the noise could be a fake. It's hard to tell what's real these days. 3 users liked this post. |
drdino
2025-06-12T10:37:00 permalink Post: 11899041 |
Comparing the sound at the beginning of this video:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ahmedabad/s/Oz5hQzDiu5 With the sound of the 787 at the 1:14 mark It sounds like it had the RAT deployed? 1 user liked this post. |
nomess
2025-06-12T10:39:00 permalink Post: 11899042 |
That sure sounds like a RAT is deployed on that video, unless it\x92s a vehicle passing by.
I think I can somewhat see it deployed during the pitch up. |
FullWings
2025-06-12T12:12:00 permalink Post: 11899143 |
How horrible. From what has surfaced so far, it does appear that the aircraft became airborne and got to a reasonable height and groundspeed, within parameters for a normal takeoff. The video with RAT-like audio and the snapshot from another video showing hints of RAT deployment seem to be the biggest clues so far: flaps and gear are a minor issue compared with a serious power loss, although loss of electrical power would trigger the RAT if it uses the same logic on the 787 as earlier Boeings.
That you can hear the RAT on the video over what should be engines at takeoff thrust at that point adds credence to the theory, as does reports of a MAYDAY. |
Spunky Monkey
2025-06-12T12:14:00 permalink Post: 11899148 |
For an aircraft that will likely have TOGA pressed and be at a high power setting (plus the RAT deployed) it sounds awfully quiet.
Perhaps the gear was down because they knew they were going to force land due to lack of thrust. (Only a 738 driver), but the electric pumps to drive the hydraulics is much slower than the engine driven pumps and so flap selection / re-selection could be not as expected. RIP to all involved. 1 user liked this post. |
Someone Somewhere
2025-06-12T12:34:00 permalink Post: 11899162 |
For an aircraft that will likely have TOGA pressed and be at a high power setting (plus the RAT deployed) it sounds awfully quiet.
Perhaps the gear was down because they knew they were going to force land due to lack of thrust. (Only a 738 driver), but the electric pumps to drive the hydraulics is much slower than the engine driven pumps and so flap selection / re-selection could be not as expected. RIP to all involved. The 787 has 2x Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorders (EAFR), which each record both cockpit voice and flight data. Hopefully flight data is not going to be an issue for this investigation. It's also maybe visible in a few stills (e.g. post 64). Last edited by Someone Somewhere; 14th Jun 2025 at 06:01 . 2 users liked this post. |
YRP
2025-06-12T13:00:00 permalink Post: 11899183 |
How horrible. From what has surfaced so far, it does appear that the aircraft became airborne and got to a reasonable height and groundspeed, within parameters for a normal takeoff. The video with RAT-like audio and the snapshot from another video showing hints of RAT deployment seem to be the biggest clues so far: flaps and gear are a minor issue compared with a serious power loss, although loss of electrical power would trigger the RAT if it uses the same logic on the 787 as earlier Boeings.
That you can hear the RAT on the video over what should be engines at takeoff thrust at that point adds credence to the theory, as does reports of a MAYDAY. Likely: this is not the RAT sound; it is just poor audio pickup. |
A320 Glider
2025-06-12T13:16:00 permalink Post: 11899202 |
Just to confirm.
The 787 is an aircraft which likes to, performance wise, use all of the available runway for takeoff. Sometimes you can be sat in the 787 and as you are rolling down the runway, you start wondering if Rotate has been called or not. It loves taking up all of the runway. Nevertheless, there are some interesting speculations over on X. One guy even claimed the Captain was in the lavatory during the accident... Many people have noted what appears to be the RAT deployed in the video footage suggesting dual engine failure. Possible wrong engine shutdown? But who diagnoses and actions an engine failure and shutdown below 400ft? |
whatdoesthisbuttondo
2025-06-12T15:36:00 permalink Post: 11899358 |
I don't really understand why so many people have latched so hard onto the theory that the flaps were not extended based off nothing but a poor quality video (while also ignoring other clues in that same video, such as what is almost certainly the sound of a ram air turbine - never mind that even in that video you
can
equally conclude that the slats and flaps are extended).
One would think it sensible to at least wait for higher quality images/video to emerge before saying it with confidence, given how incredible the claim and aspersions being cast on the crews' basic competence and professionalism are. It\x92s then taking off heavy weight with 35c and the flaps have been raised and the gear is still down. As nobody realised the flaps had been raised instead of the gear when it happened they automatically think it\x92s some other issue as the aircraft loses lift and the amber band rapidly rises and the aircraft runs out of lift. could be something else like fuel or 2 engine failure but seems possible it\x92s an action slip also. I didn\x92t see the RAT deployed but saw the gear down still and an aircraft fall out of the sky with what sounded like engines running still. 1 user liked this post. |
L8ngtkite
2025-06-12T15:39:00 permalink Post: 11899361 |
AD compliance?
aviationweek.com/aerospace/aircraft-propulsion/faa-boeing-787s-need-be-powered-every-120-days
aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/14494/in-what-circumstances-could-a-787-stay-powered-on-continuously-for-248-days Loud bang heard by pax 11A suggests otherwise. (ie EFATO) but still\x85 Could It have been a compressor stall / flow reversal at the point of EEC shutdown? Loss of thrust on both engines? The odds are slim but would the RAT deploy in such a scenario? (or has the RAT deployment observation been debunked?) 1 user liked this post. |
Golfss
2025-06-12T15:39:00 permalink Post: 11899363 |
No the plane barely took off the runway, low power setting/bad flaps. Unless you are saying a double engine failure before take off but seriously how likely is that? It's much more plausible to mess up the take off settings we have seen it many times before. But I think we will find out soon, no need to speculate too much.
|
ahmetdouas
2025-06-12T15:40:00 permalink Post: 11899366 |
|
SloppyJoe
2025-06-12T15:44:00 permalink Post: 11899373 |
https://x.com/krok7517100/status/1933089931347345596
That very much sounds like the RAT is deployed as the aircraft goes by the camera. This is a higher quality video posted earlier. That is not two engines at TOGA and sounds incredibly like a RAT. I think most commenting about not hearing a RAT are watching the more widely shared low quality vid with very poor sound. 8 users liked this post. |
slacktide
2025-06-12T15:55:00 permalink Post: 11899396 |
9 users liked this post. |
AirScotia
2025-06-12T16:15:00 permalink Post: 11899420 |
What is the precise trigger for the RAT to deploy automatically on the 787? Full failure of both engines?
|
KSINGH
2025-06-12T16:15:00 permalink Post: 11899423 |
Ok, so...
Some have said the RAT appears to have been deployed. This would suggest a hydraulic/electrical failure on the plane. A hydraulic/electrical failure could well make it impossible to retract the gear immediately. But, what do flaps do in the event of a major hydraulic/electrical failure? Is there a default that they revert back to? We can, I think, rule out engine failure, at least single engine failure because the rudder is still straight on in the Video. You can also hear the engines.. I thought this was meant to the *professional* pilot\x92s forum 1 user liked this post. |
barrymung
2025-06-12T16:17:00 permalink Post: 11899426 |
Gear unable to be retracted and flaps retracted due to no hydraulic pressure? It would certainly explain the RAT being deployed and the loss of lift.
1 user liked this post. |
Speedbird744
2025-06-12T16:18:00 permalink Post: 11899430 |
Of course the RAT will deploy if all three hydraulic systems have low pressure even with both engines running. This is the case on the 77/78. |
7478ti
2025-06-12T16:18:00 permalink Post: 11899432 |
Please all... let's get more facts and data before unwarranted speculation about cause or culpability.
That's especially pertinent about questionable aspects like flap extensions used for takeoff, temperature effects, limited runway distance, and other likely irrelevant circumstances. The "bang", Mayday call, potential RAT deployment, and high alpha touchdown may prove significant, ....if and only if they are later verified by accident investigation. It is most inappropriate to yet for any professional aviators be inferring any flight crew, airline, or OEM connections whatsoever. Only sympathy and aid for the crew, passengers, families, airline, and those impacted by this tragic crash, and support to the accident investigators, ....should be in our thoughts and prayers at this point. 6 users liked this post. |
Page Links: First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last Index Page