Posts by user "B2N2" [Posts: 10 Total up-votes: 17 Pages: 1]

B2N2
2025-06-12T22:05:00
permalink
Post: 11899779
Originally Posted by Copenhagen
Any chance this was fuel contamination?
No\x85
Certain jet fuel types may not be authorized for use by the manufacturer but the engines would still run.
Jet engines can run on (almost) anything.
its not like Jet A into a piston engine.

Subjects: Fuel (All)  Fuel Contamination

B2N2
2025-06-14T06:43:00
permalink
Post: 11901167
Maybe mentioned before, maybe not.
Airplane landed 11:18 and took off 13:38, with some taxi time at both ends that\x92s about 2hrs at the gate with ramp temperatures likely about 40C.
I know there is a brake MEL/DMI that requires gear to remain down for 2 min.
Perhaps a reason for the gear down situation.

Subjects: Gear Retraction

B2N2
2025-06-14T06:49:00
permalink
Post: 11901170
Originally Posted by parishiltons
Is it possible that a reduced power takeoff error is a factor, similar to the EK407 near-accident in Melbourne?
Yes, very much so.
The Qatar incident in Miami is reminiscent.

https://dohanews.co/report-qatar-airways-fires-pilots-involved-in-miami-takeoff-incident/

That plus a possibly inadvertent flap retraction which above 400\x92 will trigger a reduction to CLB thrust which is maybe the reason for the \x91thrust loss\x92 call.
Some previous flights show a backtrack and some do not.
Unknown how accurate that flight tracker data is.

Subjects: Flap Retraction  Flaps (All)

1 user liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-14T14:05:00
permalink
Post: 11901514
Originally Posted by fox niner
Mate of mine ran the scenario in the 787-simulator:

Take-off with flaps 20, quite some weight added.
at the call positive rate-gear up: they left the gear DOWN and cycled the flaps from 20 to 1.

it was FLYABLE, RECOVERABLE.

albeit with both donks operating.
Same with the United incident in Hawa\xef

https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...nt-2023-08-10/

Subjects: None

1 user liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-14T14:58:00
permalink
Post: 11901550
Just to throw another wrench in the gears, the airplane flew in so it should fly out.
Except it didn\x92t.
We can over analyze for another 1000 replies, fact remains the airplane flew in without major issues and spend two hours on the ground at the gate.
Catastrophic failure just doesn\x92t randomly happen.

The elefant in the room is Boeing.
If this turns out to be an airplane issue rather than a crew action it may be the end of them.
You can\x92t have a plastic electric airplane where the engines randomly stop.

Auto throttle thrust reduction can be perceived as power loss.

Subjects: None

1 user liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-14T15:50:00
permalink
Post: 11901591
Originally Posted by 3Greens
If it was a software fault or even strongly suspected there would be a worldwide 787 groundstop. Or at least a urgent engineering works package.
investigators on the ground likely know the cause already. Engine manufacturers also remotely monitor all engine parameters worldwide so they\x92d also know.
Good point.
GE already knows and so does Air India.
For the SLF, GE will call my employer and paraphrasing here: this airframe that engine needs attention because of the following.

Subjects: Parameters

1 user liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-14T16:40:00
permalink
Post: 11901641
Originally Posted by A0283
Captain in his 40\x92s with 8200 hrs but reported to have been flying for 22 years and being a training/check pilot. So would be interesting to hear more about confirmation of his experience.
Read about him here:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...campaign=cppst

He had 8200 hrs since they switched to digital records.

Subjects: None

3 users liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-19T01:04:00
permalink
Post: 11905646
If:
  • Asiana can crash on approach and landing (Asiana 214)
  • Emirates can crash on a go-around (Emirates 521)
  • Emirates can almost crash on take off (Emirates 231)
  • United can almost crash on take off ( UA 1722)

Then Air India can have an accident on take off without any nefariousness or hidden design flaws.

This accident has the full attention of
  • Boeing
  • GE
  • FAA
  • NTSB
  • EASA

1,189 Dreamliners have been delivered.
There have been no worldwide or even regional groundings.
No Emergency AD\x92s, no required inspections.
If a hidden hardware or software issue would be suspected there would have been a response by FAA/EASA already.
The silence is deafening\x85and telling.

Subjects: FAA  NTSB

6 users liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-22T22:38:00
permalink
Post: 11908868
One of the primary laws of computer science :

BS in = BS out

The lengthy take off roll is not in itself evidence as takeoff performance is optimized for specific runways but it could be an indicator of incorrect data.
The chances of the perceived simultaneous power loss are so remote that a power reduction is much more likely.
That could be again an indicator of incorrect data
Incorrect altitude on the MCP for instance.
An Emirates 777 almost crashed on take off but was recovered by the crew.

https://www.aviation-accidents.net/e...-flight-ek231/

An unexpected thrust reduction to idle could be very disorienting and cause automation confusion even with an experienced crew.

"Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity"

Hitcham\x92s razor
Occam\x92s razor

Subjects: None

1 user liked this post.

B2N2
2025-06-30T23:09:00
permalink
Post: 11913939
Except:
​​​​​​
  • A \x91quick turnaround\x92 of a passenger aircraft is 2.5-3hrs
  • Fuel in CDG is no doubt more expensive then at DEL. Also a crew doesn\x92t just take extra fuel without dispatchers concurring
  • If anything it may have carried a little extra from DEL.
  • Turnaround was 2:38 or close to it.
  • Engines run on their own tank for take off. Two different tanks with the same contamination would be exceptionally rare.
  • A complete electrical failure due to some massive event combined with two tanks contaminated would be akin to a lightning strike on a lottery winner.

The longer this takes the more crew actions or lack thereof become the centerpiece of the investigation.
More then 1,100 787\x92s have been delivered and flying the last 14 years.
Hundreds fly every single day.
Not a whisper from any of the aviation authorities worldwide. No emergency AD\x92s..nothing.

Subjects: Electrical Failure

3 users liked this post.