Posts by user "Pilot DAR" [Posts: 44 Total up-votes: 113 Page: 3 of 3]¶

Our member WillowRun 6-3 has drawn our attention to the following:

Very significant reporting by WSJ about U.S. - India friction in the investigation.
https://www.wsj.com/business/airline...hare_permalink

Reminder for everyone for this thread, because of the high potential for confusion in this discussion, please write out "Air India" or "artificial intelligence" as you intend, so we know which one you intended...

And, please be factual, rather than speculative in your post, non factual information does not contribute to our discussion...

Thanks...

Not necessarily. I do not speak for how accident investigators do their job, and what information they choose to make public or not, but I can say that: Everything to be publicly reported will be in the public domain. That does not mean it is now, and does not mean that everything will be reported. (Your eyebrows raise....). If the NTSB investigator team does pages of mathematical analysis to make a determination, i could be that they report the determination, though not the pages of math. I can opine this based upon having seen pages of analysis to support a report (for which I was an "official" commenter), where I saw the math, and I know the four pages of comments I provided, but those did not appear in the public report, just the summary.

So, be patient for the final report, and expect to see an appropriate amount of supporting information. If, after the final report has been issued, your qualified and experienced opinion is that the NTSB has been:

As a citizen of the nation producing the report, there is probably a path to follow.

Is nice when it can be done, it cannot always be done. If a citizen group feels that there is an unreasonable risk because one operation is close to another, there are umpteen government levels to talk to in respect of zoning and building permits. I know for a fact that in some cases, private airport operators have been required to purchase adjacent land, to assure it remains a clearway. A citizen group can always approach their local government to pursue that. If that does not come forefront of land use consideration, it wouldn't be the first time....

We mods are entirely happy to keep a thread open, as long as the posts are productive, and the topic is not becoming a repetitive vortex. One really good way to prevent this, is before anyone posts their thought, read/search back through the thread to see if that thought has already been discussed, and perhaps put to rest. New posts, saying not really anything new ('cause it's been posted before) begin thread closing thinking among the moderator team. As any thread, this one will remain open, unless there seems to be a need to close it for quiet time....