Posts by user "aerobat77" [Posts: 9 Total up-votes: 0 Pages: 1]

aerobat77
June 13, 2025, 12:44:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11900472
Question is why both engines lost power . Foreign object ingestion , contaminated fuel or both cutoff levels operated ? We do not know .

Any autothrust discussion is misleading since every pilot in that situation will firewall the levers whatever thrust reduction was selected for TO . the same is true for the RAT discussion- if enough hydraulic pressure was generated or not . The plane pitched up last second so there obviously was control until the end . Of course , without energy pulling alone will not bring you anywhere .

Why did both engines fail the same second as they would be cut off ???

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff  Fuel Cutoff Switches  Hydraulic Failure (All)  RAT (All)

aerobat77
June 19, 2025, 19:11:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11906283
Originally Posted by za9ra22
Even if this were a possibility, would it not be almost certain other aircraft operating from this departure point would suffer similar problems too - even if not at the TO/climb-out phase of their flights?
Murphy . Maybe this was the first aircraft to receive fuel from a faulty storage tank . After that the airport was closed and nobody departed on this fuel ...

Most other here discussed scenarios are nonsense , e.g the system would simply ignore a cutoff command with thrust levers above idle .

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff Switches

aerobat77
June 19, 2025, 20:13:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11906330
Originally Posted by EXDAC
Are you asserting that "the system would simply ignore a cutoff command with thrust levers above idle" is a nonsense statement?
or
Are you asserting that "the system would simply ignore a cutoff command with thrust levers above idle" is a description of how the system behaves?
sorry if it was not clear : when you move the switches to cutoff and the thrust levers are above idle imho the engines would NOT cutoff , the command would be ignored .

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff Switches

aerobat77
June 19, 2025, 21:07:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11906374
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Im pretty certain in those conditions the engines will shutdown. Haven\x92t flown the 787, but every other plane would and for good reason\x97how do you deal with an uncontrollable engine?
you follow the shutdown procedures , one of the first items is to retard the power lever to idle . With levers in idle they will shutdown , above idle they will not .

Subjects: None

aerobat77
July 11, 2025, 23:19:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11919981
I operated such guarded pull-move switches on several plane types uncounted times and not a single time in my entire pilot career i had a situation that such a switch "sits" on top of the locking gate and suddenly snaps by itself .
It is either positivly on or off .

In theory i could with much fantasy imagine dirt around the locking gate that keeps it pulled where you believe its latched but imaging that both switches were sitting on top of the gate and snapped back at the very moment of rotation is too much fantasy for me .

Further , even with a non working locking gate such a switch would never move by accleration forces of the plane alone , it needs positive manual input .

their position roughly behind the thrust levers does not offer any space to store there lets say your phone which slips down and moves them .

one more point : during the very moment of rotation there is normally not a single reason to change anything in the vicinity of the center console at all to explain why you even had your hands there .



Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Switch Guards

aerobat77
July 12, 2025, 07:43:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11920297
We can be sure this switches and their locking mechanism were carefully inspected in the wreckage .

since there is no grounding of the 787 fleet i think nobody considers the switches were defective but it seems to be clear for the investigators they were pulled and switched to cutoff by pilot action .

The investigation probably now concentrates by whom of them both and to find out if it was a catastrophic operation error in a mental blackout or a concious , deliberate action .

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff Switches

aerobat77
July 14, 2025, 12:55:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11922178
It can be said that in private talks between pilot colleques there is a clear opinion what the true reason for this tragic crash was , but due to the magnitude of this event such talks are held non public .



Subjects: None

aerobat77
July 15, 2025, 11:36:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11922860
Originally Posted by mr ripley
My thoughts, without any weighting or inference are that they were:
1. moved deliberately to shutdown the engines
2. moved unintentionally and ended up shutting down the engines
Following this logic you will never know . The FDR can only record what switch was moved to what position but it cannot say what true intentions the pilot had by doing this .

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): FDR

aerobat77
July 15, 2025, 13:27:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11922943
Originally Posted by etrang
What might account for the much slower switch on, especially given the serious nature of the situation?
when you see both engines quitting right after takeoff you might be a bit shocked and perplexed . You also will struggle to imagine its your colleque who just switched both off .

Subjects: None