Page Links: Index Page
dragon6172
2025-06-12T14:48:00 permalink Post: 11899292 |
You can triangulate the camera location using the aircraft holding short for takeoff and the road sign. Then draw a line from there just to the right of the instrumentation building and you'll find the aircraft rotated with about 4000 feet of runway remaining (11000+ runway length).
Subjects: None |
dragon6172
2025-06-13T13:26:00 permalink Post: 11900517 |
The only thing that is clear from the footage is that the gear remains down. Which has led to the theory that the loss of lift is a result of the flaps being raised by mistake.
However a deployed RAT would be compelling evidence of dual engine failure or shutdown. Another explanation for the gear remaining down could be startle/distraction caused by engines rolling back at around rotate or liftoff. Subjects: Dual Engine Failure Engine Failure (All) RAT (All) RAT (Deployment) 1 user liked this post. |
dragon6172
2025-06-13T15:16:00 permalink Post: 11900622 |
In
this video
of a 787 take-off, first the inner main landing gear bay doors open, and then the bogies tilt downwards. In the first video of the crash, the bogies appear to be tilted downwards but said doors remain closed?
The video of the crash shows the gear tilted down, which should mean gear up was selected, however something kept the sequence from continuing (loss of hydraulic pressure for example). Discussed here Subjects: Gear Retraction Hydraulic Failure (All) Hydraulic Pumps MLG Tilt 6 users liked this post. |
dragon6172
2025-06-13T15:50:00 permalink Post: 11900645 |
As for the dust on rotation:
I’m inclined to go with wingtip vortices, looks like a 45m wide runway with 7.5m shoulders giving the sealed surface a 60m width. The 787 has a 60m wingspan so if he’s bang on the Centreline then the wingtips are right on the edge of the sealed surface. I’ve seen all kinds of aircraft including 737’s and even Q400’s lift dust off the edge of a 30m wide runway with 7.5m shoulders, A330’s on a 45m runway with 7.5m shoulders lift dust and debris up and they were no where near the end. Pretty sure there were data points posted earlier that shows they rotated with 4000ft remaining. Not a professional pilot but I’ve possibly spent more time than most physically on runways in my line of work including a lot of displaced thresholds and sitting on the centreline observing aircraft come and go
Plane crash near Ahmedabad..
Was explained a couple of pages back: 60m wingspan, 45m runway, wingtips overhanging the dirt. Subjects: None 6 users liked this post. |
dragon6172
2025-06-16T01:15:00 permalink Post: 11903025 |
FrequentSLF: I would be more suspicious of the hardware that feeds TCMA. Rad Alt sensing could be in error, but possibly more likely is the hardware that senses weight on wheels. May be position sensing microswitches, or perhaps gear oil pressure, but would assume redundancy, eg: two sensors per leg, then some sort of voting logic on the sensor set to find faulty hardware.and make a decision. Doubt if the software is at fault, but is there a delay between sensor output, and command to shutdown the engines ?. Alluded to doubts upthread, but I think the post was deleted. Question: Should TCMA really have the absolute power to auto shutdown engines at all, without some sort of confirmation ?.
Subjects: FAA MLG Tilt TCMA (All) Weight on Wheels |
dragon6172
2025-06-17T01:30:00 permalink Post: 11903903 |
I previously speculated the forward truck tilt was proof the gear had been selected UP and the retraction sequence was interrupted.
I\x92m not so sure now and believe there is a different conclusion from this non-normal gear position. In normal retraction sequence the gear doors open almost instantaneously after the forward truck tilt. It does seem coincidental the tilt was completed while no indication of the doors opening is visible on the rooftop video, which would suggest hydraulic failure at that exact moment; this precise timing of interruption in the retraction sequence feels unlikely. So is there a more likely answer for the forward truck tilt that does not involve movement of the gear lever? I suspect it\x92s more likely that C hydraulics lost power prior to rotation, as a consequence the truck could not tilt rearward during rotation as it normally should. Therefore it\x92s probable it always stayed in a neutral or forward tilt position from the take off run until we see it in the rooftop video. If the gear was behaving normally, and the crew had omitted to retract, it should be hanging rearwards. Watch any 787-8 takeoff video and you can see at rotation all 4 main wheels stay on the runway as the aircraft rotates. Just after wheels up they tilt rearwards. It\x92s a very subtle position change. If the gear was always in a neutral or forward truck tilt position then this undermines the theory that retraction sequence was interrupted. It insinuates the C hydraulic and electrical failure happened prior to main wheels lift off. For this reason I believe we cannot assume that gear UP was selected nor that retraction was interrupted. I\x92m seeing lots of social media posts which suggest the forward tilt means gear was in retraction and I don\x92t believe it was now. I think the truck tilt position is key to understanding the timeline of system failures and whether the automatic RAT deployment was triggered by power failures or engine(s) failure. The question remains, did loss of center hydraulics happen before or after loss of thrust? In a normal retraction, the main gear doors begin to open before the truck tilt is complete (roughly when the gear trucks are "level", seen around 8-10 second marks of this video ). The nose gear doors open at the same time the main gear tilt starts (seen in Jetstar video linked below). It's too blurry in the video/stills of the accident aircraft to definitively say the nose doors are not open, but I'd say no. And it's pretty much a certainty that the main gear doors are not open. And finally I think it is also pretty clear that the main gear trucks are tilted down to the retract position. I have no confirmation of this, but I read (or heard someone say in a video) that the truck tilt actuator was a "single acting" actuator, meaning hydraulic pressure held it in the toe up position and it was spring loaded to the retract position. Which means if hydraulic pressure was lost due to loss of power to the electric driven center hydraulic system, then the main gear trucks would tilt forward on their own without moving the gear handle. The Jetstar burst tire video somewhat backs this up, in that the blown tire caused a leak to the center hydraulic system and an alternate extension was required (thus the reason the main doors are down during the landing). No hydraulic pressure means the main gear trucks remained pointing nose down during the landing. Video here Last edited by dragon6172; 18th Jun 2025 at 03:01 . Reason: Edit video links Subjects: Electrical Failure Gear Retraction Hydraulic Failure (All) Hydraulic Pumps MLG Tilt RAT (All) RAT (Deployment) 3 users liked this post. |
dragon6172
2025-06-17T03:04:00 permalink Post: 11903933 |
You'd be half right (or if you prefer, half wrong). Each channel of the FADEC has its own thrust lever position resolver. In other Boeing aircraft, there is a single resolver per engine, with dual electrical coils (i.e. electrically isolated but mechanically connected). But in order to go for full compliance with a (in my opinion) rather extreme FAA position regarding 'single failures' and 25.901(c), the 787 thrust lever actually has dual load paths, feeding to different thrust lever resolvers for each channel.
3 users liked this post. |
dragon6172
2025-06-17T03:57:00 permalink Post: 11903950 |
Most pundits have identified the gear-tilt as evidence that only the centre electrically-driven pump can do the gear-tilt if the engines' other two hyd systems are suddenly both in QUIT mode (which accords also with the instant RAT deployment and loud noise heard by the sole survivor) - and an ensuing transition from climb-out to a deadly sinking and commensurate attitude change for speed maint.
No idea. I only got that info from the Master MEL on the FAA website. According to the MMEL the aircraft can be dispatched as long as there is one of each type sensor working on each main gear. (AIs MEL could be more restrictive) Subjects: FAA Gear Retraction Hydraulic Failure (All) Hydraulic Pumps MEL RAT (All) RAT (Deployment) TCMA (Air-ground Logic) TCMA (All) |
dragon6172
2025-06-17T04:12:00 permalink Post: 11903954 |
Pretty sure that the (RR) after that TCMA entry means it is only applicable to Rolls Royce engines. I believe the accident aircraft had GE engines?
Subjects: TCMA (All) |
dragon6172
2025-06-18T02:05:00 permalink Post: 11904837 |
It doesn't have to be both engines. The loss of one engine with the gear down will still produce the same outcome.
That still doesn't explain the bogies stowed position for retraction unless there was a total hydraulic failure, which could only occur if the aircraft was despatched with an unserviceable hydraulic system on the live engine side. Which in any case would be a no no. Subjects: Gear Retraction Hydraulic Failure (All) Hydraulic Pumps 4 users liked this post. |
Page Links: Index Page