Posts by user "galaxy flyer" [Posts: 44 Total up-votes: 0 Pages: 3]

galaxy flyer
July 15, 2025, 22:58:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11923333
Originally Posted by appruser
Literally what the Preliminary Report says happened. Even the Pilots' exchange fits within this context.

In my opinion, not enough attention is being paid to why the Pilot Monitoring might have *had to* execute the memory items for dual-engine failure.
Likely because the FDR readout showed the engines at the appropriate takeoff thrust, then the switches move, takeoff thrust goes away. Switches move back to RUN and the quick restart begins.

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): FDR  Memory Items  Preliminary Report  RUN/CUTOFF  Relight

galaxy flyer
July 16, 2025, 23:15:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11924052
Undoubtedly from someone not authorized to comment, but the WSJ just issued a breaking news piece. As it is behind a paywall, here’s the pertinent excerpt,

New details in the probe of last month’s Air India crash are shifting the focus to the senior pilot in the cockpit.

A black-box recording of dialogue between the flight’s two pilots indicates it was the captain who turned off switches that controlled fuel flowing to the plane’s two engines, according to people familiar with U.S. officials’ early assessment of evidence uncovered in the crash investigation.

The first officer who was flying the Boeing 787 Dreamliner asked the more-experienced captain why he moved the switches to the “cutoff” position after it climbed off the runway, these people said. The first officer expressed surprise and then panicked, these people said, while the captain seemed to remain calm.

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Wall Street Journal

galaxy flyer
July 17, 2025, 03:02:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11924109
Originally Posted by aox
​​​​The WSJ phrase according to people familiar with U.S. officials’ early assessment of evidence uncovered in the crash investigation

... is not necessarily the same as sources close to the investigation, speaking in condition of anonymity

Later in the article is another phrase according to people familiar with the matter, U.S. pilots and safety experts tracking the probe.

That also isn't necessarily people actually within in the investigation. Both phrases, especially the latter, can sound like descriptions of people expressing opinions after they read the report, like all the explanatory videos, or like some of the chat here. Tracking the probe isn't the same as taking part in it.
The WSJ must be in contact with someone in the investigation or very close to it. A reporter or leaker didn’t make this story up out of the air, there’s factual basis, if possibly some suppositions here. The reporter and the leaker both have strong reasons to keep the IIC off the trail,of the leaker. I think these sentences are just obfuscation to hide the leaker. I’ve been close to people at an OEM any conversation or question of an accredited party was just not done, but the world changes. Obviously, the leaker has knowledge and an agenda for release. In the US, the press won’t be sued for using leaked information.

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Wall Street Journal

galaxy flyer
July 17, 2025, 23:23:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11924758
Originally Posted by Andy_S
That's what I wondered.

AI171 took off in a broadly South Westerly direction and came down about 500m from the Civil Hospital (Red Marker in the image below)



I really don't see any good options. And the river is still 2km distant (and in any case at right angles to the direction of flight).
I would guess the OP on this subject is wildly overestimating \x93survivability\x94. Any chance off-airport barely controlled impact is gonna be catastrophic. There maybe survivors but that\x92s just luck.

Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): AI171