Posts by user "ignorantAndroid" [Posts: 25 Total up-votes: 21 Page: 2 of 2]ΒΆ

ignorantAndroid
July 14, 2025, 05:15:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921848
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
I think we'll need to agree to disagree, since those cameras won't prevent any accident (all they'll do is improve post mortems)
That would apply to FDRs and CVRs as well. The purpose of investigating accidents is to prevent future accidents.

Subjects: None

9 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ignorantAndroid
July 14, 2025, 07:02:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11921875
Looking at some past FDR data, it appears that the fuel cutoff switches are sampled at 1 Hz, but the actual valve position is sampled at 4 Hz. The position of the fire switch (fire handle) is also recorded. N1 and N2 are sampled at 1 Hz.



Subjects FDR  Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff  Fuel Cutoff Switches

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

5 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ignorantAndroid
July 14, 2025, 21:32:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11922481
Originally Posted by tdracer
Again, not familiar with the specifics of the 787, but on the 747-400/-8, one pole of the fuel switch feeds EICAS - which uses it in various message logic - and sends it out to any other aircraft systems that use it. There is "Digital Flight Data Acquisition Unit) DFDAU (pronounced Daff Du) that takes all the various system digital signals, sorts them and provides them to the DFDR and QAR. The 787 has something similar to the DFDAU but I don't recall what it's called.
It was stated earlier that 2 of the poles in the switch are wired to separate Remote Data Concentrators. The RDCs feed data into the Common Data Network (essentially an Ethernet LAN).

The EAFRs simply sniff the required data from the CDN, so there's no DFDAU as such.

For some parameters, including the fuel cutoff switches, the EAFRs also record a "Source Index." For the fuel cutoff switches, there are 4 sources numbered 1 through 4 as well as a valid/invalid flag. I don't know what the sources are, but perhaps they're the 2 RDCs plus the 2 channels of the EEC/FADEC. It appears that source 1 (the default) is not the EEC.

Subjects DFDR  Digital Flight Data Acquisition Unit  EICAS  Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff  Fuel Cutoff Switches  Parameters

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

1 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ignorantAndroid
July 16, 2025, 06:00:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11923427
Originally Posted by Musician
Where is the RadAlt antenna on a 787? Is it in the nose, or further back between the main gears?


Subjects: None

3 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.

ignorantAndroid
July 17, 2025, 21:08:00 GMT
permalink
Post: 11924625
Originally Posted by Sailvi767
The displayed EICAS messages are very different when an engine is shut down via the fuel cutoff switch vice other reasons. The EAFR records those messages. I am quite sure they have eliminated the TCMA as a problem in this accident.
Indeed, there are dedicated parameters for TCMA:

Eng1_TCMA_Shutdown_Local_EEC_A
Eng1_TCMA_Shutdown_Local_EEC_B
Eng2_TCMA_Shutdown_Local_EEC_A
Eng2_TCMA_Shutdown_Local_EEC_B





Subjects EAFR  EICAS  Fuel (All)  Fuel Cutoff  Fuel Cutoff Switches  Parameters

Links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context.

2 recorded likes for this post.

Reply to this quoting this original post. You need to be logged in. Not available on closed threads.