Posts by user "unworry" [Posts: 8 Total up-votes: 14 Pages: 1]

unworry
2025-06-16T03:43:00
permalink
Post: 11903084
Originally Posted by sevenfive
Experienced 777 driver. Have tried to solve the puzzle. Looked carefully at the video in this article many times - see below and use full screen.

I might see a small puff of smoke and a smoke-ring just before they pass the shed. Indications of en enginefailure. I also see the wings tilt briefly - a few degrees - towards left. Correct procedure after enginefailure is to tilt the wings about 3 degrees toward the engine that is still running. I also see them climb at a - it seems - too high angle for the actual conditions if engine has failed. That will kill the nescessary engineoutspeed in a few seconds and be hard to recover from. If - and I say if - they in this stressed situation managed to shot down the wrong engine following the engineout procedures the RAT would come out. That would probably preoccupy them so much they forget everything about gear and flaps.. It is a situation I believe most experienced 777 / 787 pilots would recognise as a possibility and would explain everything. But this is pure speculation. Lets wait and see what the investigation teams find out...

https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/a...w-so-far-crash
"I might see a small puff of smoke and a smoke-ring just before they pass the shed."

I originally wondered about that ... until an old colleague sent me this short clip of a triple kicking up dust rotating in the same location

For your consideration: (20 second clip)

Subjects: Engine Failure (All)  Flaps (All)  Flaps vs Gear  MLG Tilt  RAT (All)  Wrong Engine

1 user liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-16T06:51:00
permalink
Post: 11903152
Originally Posted by desmotronic
I told you this re translation 3 days ago but the post was deleted then again 2 days ago see post 993.
Notwithstanding the possibility that recollection of the traumatised survivor may be unreliable it seems clear that he thought the engines were spooling up before impact. I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt that he might be right.

Possible auto relight but too late?
There was a comment very early in the thread (couldn't locate just now so assume hoovered up by the hard-working Mods) where someone postulated that the late "flare" we see in the video was possibly a pitch-up moment as the engines relit and the pilots went from a glide to a climb posture.

I don't want to review the video again -- personally, I suspect the "revving" the survivor heard was the sound of the RAT spooling up, and that the pilots were flaring as the ground approached in the vain hope of setting her down gently. Just sharing the OPs suggestion as it relates to your comment

Last edited by unworry; 16th Jun 2025 at 07:02 .

Subjects: RAT (All)

1 user liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-16T08:15:00
permalink
Post: 11903233
Originally Posted by Europa01
Yes. Thank you tdracer. All those postulating TCMA / FADEC faults please read and understand this clear explanation.

Then, ask yourselves which extraordinarily low probability bundle of previously unrevealed faults could spontaneously manifest themselves on both engines simultaneously.

Also ask yourselves why these faults manifested at that critical phase of flight and not during taxiing or take-off roll when some of the TCMA sensors would have been primed.
After reading tdracers informative post this morning, I too was musing: Why is all this attention being given to TCMA.

Of course, when the probable cause is profoundly unclear, our continuing distrust of latent technical systems comes to the fore .... as sadly, the shadow of MCAS still looms large in our imaginations

Last edited by unworry; 16th Jun 2025 at 08:26 . Reason: a word

Subjects: Dual Engine Failure  Engine Failure (All)  FADEC  TCMA (All)  Takeoff Roll

1 user liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-16T03:43:00
permalink
Post: 11903739
Originally Posted by sevenfive
Experienced 777 driver. Have tried to solve the puzzle. Looked carefully at the video in this article many times - see below and use full screen.

I might see a small puff of smoke and a smoke-ring just before they pass the shed. Indications of en enginefailure. I also see the wings tilt briefly - a few degrees - towards left. Correct procedure after enginefailure is to tilt the wings about 3 degrees toward the engine that is still running. I also see them climb at a - it seems - too high angle for the actual conditions if engine has failed. That will kill the nescessary engineoutspeed in a few seconds and be hard to recover from. If - and I say if - they in this stressed situation managed to shot down the wrong engine following the engineout procedures the RAT would come out. That would probably preoccupy them so much they forget everything about gear and flaps.. It is a situation I believe most experienced 777 / 787 pilots would recognise as a possibility and would explain everything. But this is pure speculation. Lets wait and see what the investigation teams find out...

https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/a...w-so-far-crash
"I might see a small puff of smoke and a smoke-ring just before they pass the shed."

I originally wondered about that ... until an old colleague sent me this short clip of a triple kicking up dust rotating in the same location

For your consideration: (20 second clip)

Subjects: Engine Failure (All)  Flaps (All)  Flaps vs Gear  MLG Tilt  RAT (All)  Wrong Engine

1 user liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-16T08:15:00
permalink
Post: 11903749
Originally Posted by Europa01
Yes. Thank you tdracer. All those postulating TCMA / FADEC faults please read and understand this clear explanation.

Then, ask yourselves which extraordinarily low probability bundle of previously unrevealed faults could spontaneously manifest themselves on both engines simultaneously.

Also ask yourselves why these faults manifested at that critical phase of flight and not during taxiing or take-off roll when some of the TCMA sensors would have been primed.
After reading tdracers informative post this morning, I too was musing: Why is all this attention being given to TCMA.

Of course, when the probable cause is profoundly unclear, our continuing distrust of latent technical systems comes to the fore .... as sadly, the shadow of MCAS still looms large in our imaginations

Subjects: Dual Engine Failure  Engine Failure (All)  FADEC  TCMA (All)  Takeoff Roll

2 users liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-17T06:40:00
permalink
Post: 11904005
Originally Posted by Lord Farringdon
Edit: I might add, they would have found remains on the runway if this did indeed happen. But we have heard anything from anybody?
On Jun 13th 2025 the DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION (DGCA) reported, that initial preliminary findings rule out a bird strike as no bird carcasses have been found.

Subjects: Bird Strike  DGCA

6 users liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-17T21:35:00
permalink
Post: 11904689
Originally Posted by PC767
. . .
Investigations of all types first establish what happened, then how and why, before recommendations and actions. There is a possibility that they know the what, but the how and why incur liability.
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The Indian AAIB successfully downloaded both FDR and CVR data from an Air India 787's EAFR relating to an incident in 2018, so your misgivings on that account are unfounded.
Could the fellow who was cited as having heard the CVR and commended the pilot's actions.... because he trained under the Captain, and would be familiar with his speech, have been bought in to validate who was speaking on the transcript?

Subjects: AAIB (All)  AAIB (IDGA)  CVR  EAFR  FDR

2 users liked this post.

unworry
2025-06-18T06:25:00
permalink
Post: 11904947
Originally Posted by Drjojo
Has anybody actually seen post-crash photos of the engines?

Surely they will look very different if they were producing significant thrust at impact compared to if they were producing none.
I too was curious to see the donks but sadly all I've come across are indiscernible snaps of mangled mass


Subjects: None