Page Links: Index Page
BigBoreFour
January 25, 2023, 20:48:00 GMT permalink Post: 11373823 |
I'm curious how the shorter legs worked, such as the Washington to Miami (also Dallas at one point?) flight. Did it go supersonic on a 'shorter' flight? Was there a minimum leg distance needed for the Concorde to fly supersonic? And was there an 'optimum' altitude when it was only subsonic? Could it fly comfortably (fuel efficient) at Mach One point something as opposed to 2.0 where I thought it was probably designed to operate?
Subjects: None |
BigBoreFour
January 27, 2023, 04:18:00 GMT permalink Post: 11374753 |
Subjects: None |
BigBoreFour
January 28, 2023, 00:48:00 GMT permalink Post: 11375443 |
Whoa. Nice.
Optimum altitude subsonic at MTOW is FL250 in the Concorde. Who would've thought? ![]() Subjects: None |
BigBoreFour
January 31, 2023, 22:33:00 GMT permalink Post: 11377681 |
BIG BORE FOUR -
Remember we were never at MTOW for long in this machine! Initial subsonic cruise ex-LHR was 280-300. In the case of engine failure enroute, it usually ended up in the mid-30's (with its subsonic 4 engined contemporaries). The process explained in the extract from the OM is worth thinking about...you fly Mach, but the IAS still plays a dominant role on drag as you climb. Most unlike conventional types. Thank you. Appreciate it. Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Engine Failure IAS (Indicated Air Speed) |
BigBoreFour
August 05, 2023, 15:33:00 GMT permalink Post: 11479888 |
If it didn’t crash, would any airline(s) still fly it today? Or would the economics have become too much for it to continue?
Subjects (links are to this post in the relevant subject page so that this post can be seen in context): Air France 4590 |
Page Links: Index Page