Page Links: First Previous 1 2 Last Index Page
za9ra22
2025-06-22T18:25:00 permalink Post: 11908740 |
Two minor points regarding competence and who gets the task of data extraction from the data recorders: Firstly, that it's the AAIB (India) which will decide where and when to hand over the data recorders, and secondly, the supposed comment attributed to the Ministry of Civil Aviation in the press release dated June 19 (
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseP...x?PRID=2137718
), that "t
he decision regarding the location for decoding the flight recorders will be taken by the AAIB
after due assessment of all technical, safety, and security considerations
" would likely have been phrased rather differently if the lab in India were not considered capable of the work involved.
On edit: And mods, apologies, this is getting rather more tangential to the incident than I intended! Subjects: AAIB (All) AAIB (IDGA) DFDR |
za9ra22
2025-06-28T21:40:00 permalink Post: 11912674 |
https://paulross.github.io/pprune-th...171/index.html (I think Weight on Wheels covers posts which outline the ground/air mode discussions so far). Subjects: Weight on Wheels 2 users liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-29T16:47:00 permalink Post: 11913122 |
This is some news:
Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol interviewed The potential for sabotage is clearly a valid line of investigation in the absence - so far - of any clear evidence of more prosaic malfunction or errors, but I doubt it is anything more than one of dozens of lines of attention. Subjects: None 4 users liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-29T17:13:00 permalink Post: 11913135 |
To be honest, I don't see any detail in this reported conversation that tells me the Minister has any actual knowledge of the state of play in the investigation itself, just the process and a general round-up of what we basically already know. My guess is that the investigation has not provided any feedback yet - or at least none that the Minister is able to pass on. Subjects: AAIB (All) DFDR 1 user liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-29T17:28:00 permalink Post: 11913142 |
What is interesting/informative (to me) is what he seems not to have said... which is anything you might normally hear from the investigation itself. Subjects: None |
za9ra22
2025-06-29T20:02:00 permalink Post: 11913197 |
There's no credible reasons 'three former accident investigators' in the US would have any direct knowledge, and if any third party in the US has been provided access to data, it will have been on the basis that it is not shared. Even that I would doubt, since involved parties are far more likely to already be in India as part of the investigation. On edit, and mindful of the Mods comments around the closing of the thread previously: I don't speak with any direct knowledge of accident investigations in India, only the UK - and even then with only one experience of civil aviation accident work. But I have been involved (in human factors as investigator and lead) in several UK incidents of scale, and have some familiarity with how these processes are constituted and work... there at least. Last edited by za9ra22; 29th Jun 2025 at 20:19 . Reason: Clarification Subjects: EAFR |
za9ra22
2025-06-29T20:50:00 permalink Post: 11913221 |
One thing they said is that the accident site was 'cleaned up, short order', suggesting that this might make it difficult to check physical state against what the FDR has recorded, eg if the FDR says the flaps are down, but the physical evidence says the flaps are not down. They show video of a digger scooping up wreckage.
As I said, I've been out of the loop for a few days. Do we know if the wreckage is being reconstructed in a warehouse, or whatever? I appreciate there may not have been that much left to reassemble, but the was at least one wing, a tail section, and the wing box section that the chap managed to escape from. One has to wonder why people might suggest otherwise, but the (probable) reality is that the authorities in India are doing what they think is needed in a situation where they know more than we do. If, for example, they are clearing the accident site after two weeks, they may think they have retrieved all the information from it that they can, and nobody else can really say otherwise. As to reconstructing the wreckage, who knows (as yet), though my experience of a fire on board a fully fueled aircraft that has crashed on takeoff is that there may not be much to reconstruct. Certain parts, such as wings and the tail section for example, if in coherent condition, could be recovered and removed - and I seriously doubt anyone other than on the scene at the time, would be able to know. All in all, the supposition that this is being done 'in haste' is nonsense. It suggests there's an attempt at a cover up of some kind, which is rather silly in a situation where an airliner crashes in a very public place, thousands witness it, it's filmed and put on TV, there are investigators from local authorities, the US and UK all present - all with different and contentious interests, plus the glare of media and others is on them. But 3 guys in the US on YouTube have uncovered the truth... Yeah, I doubt it. Subjects: FDR 8 users liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-30T01:09:00 permalink Post: 11913311 |
I would disagree with this. Given the airspeed at 174 knots and a peak altitude of about 175 feet the aircraft had some energy for the pilots to work with. Stall speed was likely around 120 knots so they had 55 knots of airspeed and 175 feet of altitude to convert to distance.
Subjects: None 1 user liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-30T15:23:00 permalink Post: 11913693 |
As neither mod nor admin
You left out this part: over a populated area that was somewhat built up. That adds a degree of difficulty to the attempt, with a modest amount of energy and altitude with which to work. (They hit a building on the way down; some of the casualties were people on the ground). ![]() I'll refrain from adding other thoughts since the thread has moved on since. Subjects: None 1 user liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-30T16:02:00 permalink Post: 11913727 |
Posted yesterday, this is from NDTV who conducted the interview/conversation with the Minister himself.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/sabo...-mohol-8788920 Their own english language version seems most likely to be accurate to the actual conversation. This was discussed previously, and it seems highly improbable that the Minister had anything much in the way of a briefing or insider knowledge of the state of the investigation or its findings. Last edited by za9ra22; 30th Jun 2025 at 16:24 . Subjects: None 1 user liked this post. |
za9ra22
2025-06-30T22:04:00 permalink Post: 11913913 |
that, given the configuration of the aircraft
if there is a significant electrical failure (sufficient for the RAT to auto-deploy)
The aircraft fuel pumps are lost
the fuel being received by the engines is arriving from a different source
a potentially contaminated source
I believe that the engine failure is a secondary result of the power loss (with specific circumstances)
It isn't that your suppositions are necessarily bad ones, but that they seem a bit of a stretch. Of course I'm no expert, hence asking. Last edited by za9ra22; 30th Jun 2025 at 22:19 . Subjects: Electrical Failure Engine Failure (All) Fuel (All) Fuel Pumps RAT (All) 2 users liked this post. |